Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes in Congo
Congo: Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. β¬ Flat
Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes in Congo, 2014β2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Congo stood at 2 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Congo ranks 1st of 185 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Countries ranked near Congo
- 1 China 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 India 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Indonesia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Albania 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Algeria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Austria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Belgium 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Benin 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bulgaria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Cape Verde 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Chad 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Colombia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Egypt 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 France 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Hong Kong, China 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Israel 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Italy 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kuwait 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Lebanon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Luxembourg 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Malta 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Mauritius 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Mongolia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Morocco 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 New Zealand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Philippines 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Rwanda 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Senegal 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Serbia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Togo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Tunisia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Congo
- Merchandise trade 94.4% (2025)
- Food imports 21.2% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 71.4% (2023)
- Merchandise imports 7.90 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 0.2% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 10.3% (2023)
- Merchandise exports 7.50 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 1,157 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.4599 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate -4.57 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Congo?
- Dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Congo was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Congo rank for dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes?
- Congo ranks 1st out of 185 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The liability and insurance regimes index evaluates the stringency of latent defect liability and insurance regimes. It has two components: (i) whether any parties involved in the construction process are held legally liable for latent defects such as structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use; (ii) whether any party involved in the construction process is legally required to obtain a latent defect liability or decennial (10 years) liability insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.