Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
0 DB16-20 methodology
World rank
99th
of 186 countries
All-time high
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of stood at 0 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That places Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 99th out of 186 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
- 99 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 India 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Indonesia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Nigeria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Pakistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Albania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Algeria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Angola 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Bahamas, The 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Barbados 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Belize 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Bolivia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Burkina Faso 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Burundi 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Cabo Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Cambodia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Comoros, Union of the 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Congo, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Côte d'Ivoire 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Djibouti 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Dominica 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Dominican Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 El Salvador 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Equatorial Guinea, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Eritrea, The State of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Ghana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Greece 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Grenada 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Guatemala 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Guyana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Honduras 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Jamaica 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Kenya 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Madagascar, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Malta 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Mongolia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Mozambique, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Namibia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Nicaragua 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Panama 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Papua New Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Peru 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Puerto Rico 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Romania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Samoa 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Saudi Arabia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Senegal 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Somalia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 South Sudan, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Sri Lanka 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Syrian Arab Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Tanzania, United Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Tunisia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Uganda 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Ukraine 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Venezuela, República Bolivariana de 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Vietnam 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Yemen, Republic of 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Zimbabwe 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
- Merchandise trade 22.2% (2025)
- Food imports 26.9% (2019)
- Manufactures imports 41.1% (2019)
- Merchandise imports 3.61 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 63.9% (2019)
- Manufactures exports 4.8% (2019)
- Merchandise exports 926.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 21.12 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0517 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 0.7617 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of?
- Registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 99th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.