Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Guinea-Bissau
Guinea-Bissau: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
0 DB16-20 methodology
World rank
99th
of 186 countries
All-time high
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Guinea-Bissau, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Guinea-Bissau is 0 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 99th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Guinea-Bissau
- 99 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 India 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Indonesia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Nigeria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Pakistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Afghanistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Albania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Algeria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Angola 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Bahamas 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Barbados 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Belize 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Bolivia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Burkina Faso 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Burundi 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Cabo Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Cambodia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Côte d’Ivoire 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Djibouti 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Dominica 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Dominican Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Egypt 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 El Salvador 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Eritrea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Ghana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Greece 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Grenada 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Guatemala 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Guyana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Honduras 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Jamaica 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Kazakhstan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Kenya 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Lesotho 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Madagascar 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Malta 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Mauritania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Mongolia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Mozambique 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Namibia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Nicaragua 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Panama 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Papua New Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Peru 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Puerto Rico 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Romania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Samoa 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Saudi Arabia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Senegal 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Somalia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 South Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Sri Lanka 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Syria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Tajikistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Tanzania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Tunisia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Uganda 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Ukraine 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Venezuela 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Viet Nam 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Yemen 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 99 Zimbabwe 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Guinea-Bissau
- Merchandise trade 31.7% (2025)
- Food imports 41.7% (2018)
- Manufactures imports 38.6% (2018)
- Merchandise imports 489.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 68.5% (2018)
- Manufactures exports 0.0% (2015)
- Merchandise exports 313.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 48.77 million current US$ (2024)
- Transport services 34.5% (2024)
- Computer, communications and other services 20.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Guinea-Bissau?
- Registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Guinea-Bissau was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The highest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Guinea-Bissau?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Guinea-Bissau rank for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 99th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Guinea-Bissau data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.