Statizoid

Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
0 DB16-20 methodology
World rank
98th
of 184 countries
All-time high
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
0 DB16-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Equatorial Guinea, 2015–2019

00.20.40.60.812015201720192015: 0 DB16-20 methodology2016: 0 DB16-20 methodology2017: 0 DB16-20 methodology2018: 0 DB16-20 methodology2019: 0 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

Equatorial Guinea recorded 0 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 98th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea

  1. 98 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 98 India 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 98 Indonesia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 98 Nigeria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 98 Pakistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 98 Afghanistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 98 Albania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 98 Algeria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 98 Angola 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 98 Bahamas 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 98 Barbados 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 98 Belize 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 98 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 98 Bolivia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 98 Burkina Faso 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 98 Burundi 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 98 Cape Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 98 Cambodia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 98 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 98 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 98 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 98 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 98 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 98 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 98 Cote d'Ivoire 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 98 Dominica 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 98 Dominican Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 98 Egypt 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 98 El Salvador 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 98 Eritrea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  31. 98 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  32. 98 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  33. 98 Ghana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  34. 98 Greece 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  35. 98 Grenada 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  36. 98 Guatemala 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  37. 98 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  38. 98 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  39. 98 Guyana 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  40. 98 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  41. 98 Honduras 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  42. 98 Jamaica 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  43. 98 Kazakhstan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  44. 98 Kenya 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  45. 98 Lesotho 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  46. 98 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  47. 98 Madagascar 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  48. 98 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  49. 98 Malta 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  50. 98 Mauritania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  51. 98 Mongolia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  52. 98 Mozambique 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  53. 98 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  54. 98 Namibia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  55. 98 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  56. 98 Nicaragua 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  57. 98 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  58. 98 Panama 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  59. 98 Papua New Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  60. 98 Peru 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  61. 98 Puerto Rico 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  62. 98 Romania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  63. 98 Samoa 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  64. 98 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  65. 98 Saudi Arabia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  66. 98 Senegal 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  67. 98 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  68. 98 Somalia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  69. 98 South Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  70. 98 Sri Lanka 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  71. 98 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  72. 98 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  73. 98 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  74. 98 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  75. 98 Syria 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  76. 98 Tajikistan 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  77. 98 Tanzania 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  78. 98 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  79. 98 Tunisia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  80. 98 Uganda 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  81. 98 Ukraine 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  82. 98 Venezuela 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  83. 98 Vietnam 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  84. 98 Yemen 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  85. 98 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology compare
  86. 98 Zimbabwe 0 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More private sector data for Equatorial Guinea

All data for Equatorial Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Equatorial Guinea?
Registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Equatorial Guinea was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Equatorial Guinea rank for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 98th out of 184 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 930 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.