Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20) in Syria
Syria: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20) was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Syria, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Syria recorded 0 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over five years.
Syria ranks 100th of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20) in Syria, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | -100.0% |
| 2017 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2018 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2019 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
Syria compared with similar countries
- Syria's 0 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology. (22 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Syria
- 100 Bangladesh 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 India 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Indonesia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Nigeria 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Pakistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Afghanistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Albania 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Algeria 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Angola 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Bahamas 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Barbados 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Belize 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Benin 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Bolivia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Burkina Faso 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Burundi 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Cape Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Cambodia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Cameroon 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Central African Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Chad 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Comoros 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Democratic Republic of Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Congo 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Cote d'Ivoire 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Djibouti 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Dominica 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Dominican Republic 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Egypt 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 El Salvador 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Equatorial Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Eritrea 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Ethiopia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Gabon 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Ghana 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Greece 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Grenada 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Guatemala 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Guinea-Bissau 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Guyana 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Haiti 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Honduras 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Jamaica 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Kazakhstan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Kenya 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Lesotho 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Liberia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Madagascar 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Malta 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Mauritania 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Mongolia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Mozambique 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Myanmar 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Namibia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Nepal 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Nicaragua 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Niger 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Panama 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Papua New Guinea 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Peru 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Puerto Rico 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Romania 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Samoa 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Sao Tome and Principe 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Saudi Arabia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Senegal 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Sierra Leone 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Somalia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 South Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Sri Lanka 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Sudan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Suriname 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Tajikistan 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Tanzania 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Togo 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Tunisia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Uganda 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Ukraine 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Venezuela 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Vietnam 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Yemen 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Zambia 0 DB16-20 methodology
- 100 Zimbabwe 0 DB16-20 methodology
More private sector data for Syria
- Merchandise trade 79.2% (2025)
- Food imports 21.0% (2010)
- Manufactures imports 54.1% (2010)
- Merchandise imports 7.91 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 3.44 billion current US$ (2010)
- Food exports 21.0% (2010)
- Manufactures exports 24.7% (2010)
- Merchandise exports 3.38 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 7.04 billion current US$ (2010)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 132.12 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Syria?
- Registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Syria was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Syria?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Syria?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2016.
- How does Syria rank for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Syria ranks 100th out of 187 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Syria data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.