Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Albania

Albania: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 52.68 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
52.68
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
167th
of 191 countries
All-time high
53.41
in 2014
All-time low
0
in 2015
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Albania, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 53.42015: 02016: 52.62017: 52.62018: 52.62019: 52.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Albania is 52.68, measured in 2019.

The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and down 1.4% over ten years.

Albania ranks 167th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Albania, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Albania, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 53.41 —
2015 0 -100.0%
2016 52.57 —
2017 52.6 +0.1%
2018 52.65 +0.1%
2019 52.68 +0.1%

Albania compared with similar countries

  • Albania's 52.68 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 70.92, 74% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Albania's 52.68 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.51, 72% of the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Albania

  1. 164 Vanuatu 54.57 compare
  2. 165 Lebanon 53.72 compare
  3. 166 Lesotho 52.95 compare
  4. 168 Guyana 52.52 compare
  5. 169 El Salvador 52.35 compare
  6. 170 Kiribati 52.2 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Albania

All data for Albania →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Albania?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Albania was 52.68 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Albania?
The highest recorded value was 53.41 in 2014.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Albania?
The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2015.
How does Albania rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Albania ranks 167th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Albania?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Albania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Albania. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/albania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/albania/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Albania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.