Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Vanuatu

Vanuatu: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 54.57 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
54.57
Change on year
down 0.2%
World rank
164th
of 191 countries
All-time high
54.68
in 2018
All-time low
53.05
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Vanuatu, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 53.12015: 53.62016: 542017: 542018: 54.72019: 54.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Vanuatu stood at 54.57.

The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 2.9% over ten years.

That places Vanuatu 164th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Vanuatu, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Vanuatu, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 53.05 —
2015 53.62 +1.1%
2016 54.05 +0.8%
2017 54.04 -0.0%
2018 54.68 +1.2%
2019 54.57 -0.2%

Vanuatu compared with similar countries

  • Vanuatu's 54.57 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 64.54, 85% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Vanuatu's 54.57 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 71.5, 76% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Vanuatu

  1. 162 Burundi 55.01 compare
  2. 163 Equatorial Guinea 55.01 compare
  3. 165 Lebanon 53.72 compare
  4. 166 Lesotho 52.95 compare
  5. 167 Albania 52.68 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Vanuatu

All data for Vanuatu →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Vanuatu?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Vanuatu was 54.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Vanuatu?
The highest recorded value was 54.68 in 2018.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Vanuatu?
The lowest recorded value was 53.05 in 2014.
How does Vanuatu rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Vanuatu ranks 164th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Vanuatu?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Vanuatu data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Vanuatu. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/vanuatu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/vanuatu/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Vanuatu</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.