Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Estonia

Estonia: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 82.55 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
82.55
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
19th
of 191 countries
All-time high
82.55
in 2019
All-time low
82.47
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Estonia, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 82.52015: 82.52016: 82.52017: 82.52018: 82.52019: 82.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Estonia stood at 82.55. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.1% over ten years.

That places Estonia 19th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Estonia, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Estonia, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 82.47 —
2015 82.48 +0.0%
2016 82.49 +0.0%
2017 82.5 +0.0%
2018 82.53 +0.0%
2019 82.55 +0.0%

Estonia compared with similar countries

  • Estonia's 82.55 is above the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Estonia's 82.55 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.51, 1.1× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Estonia

  1. 16 Morocco 83.25 compare
  2. 17 Bahrain 83.13 compare
  3. 18 Japan 83.09 compare
  4. 20 Ukraine 81.14 compare
  5. 21 Georgia 80.98 compare
  6. 22 Norway 80.58 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Estonia

All data for Estonia →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Estonia?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Estonia was 82.55 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Estonia?
The highest recorded value was 82.55 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Estonia?
The lowest recorded value was 82.47 in 2014.
How does Estonia rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Estonia ranks 19th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Estonia?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Estonia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Estonia. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/estonia/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Estonia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.