Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Malawi

Malawi: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 63.13 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
63.13
Change on year
up 3.2%
World rank
128th
of 191 countries
All-time high
63.13
in 2019
All-time low
53.54
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Malawi, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 53.52015: 58.22016: 54.82017: 59.22018: 61.22019: 63.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Malawi stood at 63.13. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.2% on the previous year and up 17.9% over ten years.

Malawi ranks 128th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Malawi, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Malawi, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 53.54 —
2015 58.25 +8.8%
2016 54.76 -6.0%
2017 59.22 +8.2%
2018 61.17 +3.3%
2019 63.13 +3.2%

Malawi compared with similar countries

  • Malawi's 63.13 is above the median for low income countries, which is 48.88, 1.3× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Malawi's 63.13 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 62.6, 1.0× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Malawi

  1. 125 Cyprus 64.15 compare
  2. 126 Trinidad and Tobago 64.13 compare
  3. 127 Togo 64.12 compare
  4. 129 Palau 63.1 compare
  5. 130 Grenada 62.49 compare
  6. 131 Senegal 62.06 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Malawi

All data for Malawi →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Malawi?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Malawi was 63.13 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Malawi?
The highest recorded value was 63.13 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Malawi?
The lowest recorded value was 53.54 in 2014.
How does Malawi rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Malawi ranks 128th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Malawi?
Over the last ten years it is up 17.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Malawi data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Malawi. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/malawi/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Malawi</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.