Statizoid

Dealing with construction: Quality control after in Antigua and Barbuda

Antigua and Barbuda: Dealing with construction: Quality control after was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
135th
of 186 countries
All-time high
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in Antigua and Barbuda, 2014–2019

00.511.522014201620192014: 2 DB16-20 methodology2015: 2 DB16-20 methodology2016: 2 DB16-20 methodology2017: 2 DB16-20 methodology2018: 2 DB16-20 methodology2019: 2 DB16-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Antigua and Barbuda is 2 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 135th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction: Quality control after in Antigua and Barbuda, year by year

Year DB16-20 methodology Change
2014 2 DB16-20 methodology —
2015 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 2 DB16-20 methodology +0.0%

Antigua and Barbuda compared with similar countries

  • Antigua and Barbuda's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Antigua and Barbuda's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Antigua and Barbuda

  1. 132 Nigeria 2.77 DB16-20 methodology compare
  2. 133 Brazil 2.39 DB16-20 methodology compare
  3. 134 Mexico 2.17 DB16-20 methodology compare
  4. 135 Angola 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  5. 135 Benin 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  6. 135 Bolivia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  7. 135 Burundi 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  8. 135 Cambodia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  9. 135 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  10. 135 Central African Republic 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  11. 135 Comoros 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  12. 135 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  13. 135 Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  14. 135 Cote d'Ivoire 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  15. 135 Dominica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  16. 135 Ethiopia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  17. 135 France 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  18. 135 Gabon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  19. 135 Gambia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  20. 135 Germany 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  21. 135 Ghana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  22. 135 Grenada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  23. 135 Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  24. 135 Guinea-Bissau 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  25. 135 Guyana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  26. 135 Haiti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  27. 135 Iraq 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  28. 135 Jamaica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  29. 135 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  30. 135 Kiribati 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  31. 135 Lesotho 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  32. 135 Madagascar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  33. 135 Mali 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  34. 135 Mauritania 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  35. 135 Niger 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  36. 135 Poland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  37. 135 Sao Tome and Principe 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  38. 135 Senegal 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  39. 135 Solomon Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  40. 135 South Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  41. 135 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  42. 135 Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  43. 135 Suriname 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  44. 135 East Timor 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  45. 135 Togo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
  46. 135 Zambia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More private sector data for Antigua and Barbuda

All data for Antigua and Barbuda →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Antigua and Barbuda?
Dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Antigua and Barbuda was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
How does Antigua and Barbuda rank for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 135th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction rising or falling in Antigua and Barbuda?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Antigua and Barbuda data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in Antigua and Barbuda. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-quality-control-after-construction-index-0-3-db16-20/antigua-and-barbuda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-quality-control-after-construction-index-0-3-db16-20/antigua-and-barbuda/">Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in Antigua and Barbuda</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,115 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.