Dealing with construction: Quality control during in Singapore
Singapore: Dealing with construction: Quality control during was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during in Singapore, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits: quality control during in Singapore is 3 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of up 50.0% on the previous year and up 200.0% over ten years.
That places Singapore 1st out of 186 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
Dealing with construction: Quality control during in Singapore, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +100.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +50.0% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 3 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 3 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Singapore
- 1 China 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Russia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Australia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Denmark 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Djibouti 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Estonia 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 France 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Hong Kong 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Ireland 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Luxembourg 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Netherlands 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 New Zealand 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Peru 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Rwanda 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Sweden 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Kingdom 3 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Singapore
- Merchandise trade 177.6% (2025)
- Food imports 3.5% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 74.5% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 505.84 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 384.49 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 2.3% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 78.2% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 566.87 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 421.98 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 92,760 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: quality control during in Singapore?
- Dealing with construction permits: quality control during in Singapore was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: quality control during recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2019.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: quality control during recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Singapore rank for dealing with construction permits: quality control during?
- Singapore ranks 1st out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: quality control during rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is up 200.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The quality control during construction index evaluates quality control during the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether inspections are mandated by law during the construction process; (ii) whether inspections during construction are implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.