Getting electricity: Minimum outage time (in minutes) (DB16-20 methodology) by country

The minimum outage time is the minimum time, in minutes, considered for the calculation of the SAIDI and SAIFI indices. If the minimum outage time exceeds 5 minutes, an economy is not eligible to obtain a score on the Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index component. The index is computed based on...

Countries reporting
136
Highest
30 DB16-20 methodology
Marshall Islands
Lowest
0 DB16-20 methodology
Singapore
Median
3 DB16-20 methodology
Years covered
6
2014–2019
Data points
816

What the numbers show

Getting electricity: Minimum outage time (in minutes) (DB16-20 methodology) is currently reported for 136 countries. The highest value is 30 DB16-20 methodology in Marshall Islands; the lowest is 0 DB16-20 methodology in Singapore.

The median across all reporting countries is 3 DB16-20 methodology, and the mean is 3.65 DB16-20 methodology.

Over the past decade 6 countries rose and 16 fell. The largest increase was in Armenia (up 400.0%), and the largest decrease in Iceland (down 100.0%).

Getting electricity: Minimum outage time (in minutes): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Marshall Islands 30 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Palau 30 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Suriname 30 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
1 Kosovo 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
4 Zimbabwe 10 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 United Arab Emirates 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Armenia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 400.0% volatile
5 Belize 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Barbados 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Bhutan 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Cote d'Ivoire 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Costa Rica 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Cyprus 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Dominica 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Egypt, Arab Rep. 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Fiji 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Grenada 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged rising
5 Guyana 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Indonesia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 India 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Iran, Islamic Rep. 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 150.0% rising
5 Jamaica 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Korea, Rep. 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Kuwait 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Mexico 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Mongolia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Mauritania 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Namibia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Nigeria 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Oman 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Philippines 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Papua New Guinea 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Puerto Rico (US) 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Qatar 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Rwanda 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 50.0% falling
5 Saudi Arabia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Sudan 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Eswatini 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 66.7% rising
5 Togo 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Tonga 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Turkiye 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Uganda 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 16.7% falling
5 Viet Nam 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 Samoa 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
5 South Africa 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 400.0% volatile
5 Zambia 5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
46 United States 4.2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
47 Tanzania 4 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 100.0% rising
48 Argentina 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Australia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 up 200.0% volatile
48 Austria 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Azerbaijan 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 25.0% falling
48 Belgium 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Bulgaria 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Bolivia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Brazil 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Switzerland 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Chile 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 China 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Colombia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Czechia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Germany 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Dominican Republic 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Algeria 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Ecuador 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Spain 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Estonia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 40.0% falling
48 France 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 United Kingdom 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Georgia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Greece 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Guatemala 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Croatia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Hungary 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Ireland 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Italy 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Lithuania 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Latvia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Moldova 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 North Macedonia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Mauritius 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Nicaragua 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Norway 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Pakistan 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Panama 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Peru 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Poland 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Portugal 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Paraguay 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Romania 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 El Salvador 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Serbia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 40.0% falling
48 Slovak Republic 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Slovenia 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Sweden 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Ukraine 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 40.0% falling
48 Uruguay 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
48 Vanuatu 3 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
99 Sri Lanka 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 60.0% falling
99 Solomon Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
99 Trinidad and Tobago 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
99 Tunisia 2 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Antigua and Barbuda 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Bahrain 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Brunei Darussalam 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Canada 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Denmark 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 66.7% volatile
103 Hong Kong 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Israel 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Japan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Kazakhstan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Kenya 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Cambodia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 80.0% volatile
103 Morocco 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Malaysia 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Niger 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 New Zealand 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 West Bank and Gaza 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 66.7% falling
103 Russian Federation 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 80.0% volatile
103 San Marino 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Seychelles 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Thailand 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
103 Taiwan 1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
124 Belarus 0.5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
124 Uzbekistan 0.5 DB16-20 methodology 2019 unchanged flat
126 Luxembourg 0.1 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 96.7% volatile
127 Netherlands 0.083 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 30.8% rising
128 Finland 0.01 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 99.7% falling
129 Cabo Verde 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
129 Iceland 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 100.0% volatile
129 Jordan 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
129 St. Lucia 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
129 Mali 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
129 Malta 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
129 Singapore 0 DB16-20 methodology 2019 down 100.0% volatile

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Minimum outage time (in minutes) (DB16-20 methodology)
Unit
DB16-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
136 places, 816 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The minimum outage time is the minimum time, in minutes, considered for the calculation of the SAIDI and SAIFI indices. If the minimum outage time exceeds 5 minutes, an economy is not eligible to obtain a score on the Reliability of supply and transparency of tariff index component. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.